Insights to Help Your Business
Understand what return fraud is and how to protect yourself from it. Learn how to identify different types of return theft and effective strategies you can use.
UK retailers lose an estimated $2.6 billion annually to return policy abuse, including practices like wardrobing (wear and return) and false non-delivery claims .
With online shopping at an all-time high, especially during the festive season, many businesses offer flexible return policies to enhance customer convenience. While these policies improve the shopping experience, they can also be exploited by fraudsters.
To stay ahead, e-commerce businesses are implementing stronger measures to prevent fraudulent returns without compromising customer satisfaction.
In this article, we’ll explore what returns fraud is and practical strategies to reduce the risk for your business.
Review your returns policy to eliminate loopholes. Implement tamper-evident packaging to prevent product swaps. Invest in staff training so your team can identify suspicious patterns early.
Returns fraud, sometimes referred to as refund fraud or refund theft, occurs when an individual purchases an item and deliberately attempts to return it dishonestly. The aim is typically to obtain a refund, store credit, or an exchange by exploiting weaknesses in a retailer’s returns policy.
It’s important to note that the vast majority of customers use return processes legitimately – for example, returning clothing that doesn’t fit or items that don’t meet expectations. However, a small number of bad actors intentionally manipulate return and refund policies for financial gain, creating challenges for retailers seeking to balance customer service with fraud prevention.
However, a small number of bad actors intentionally manipulate return and refund policies for financial gain, creating challenges for retailers seeking to balance customer service with fraud prevention.
Illegitimate returns continue to rise with UK retailers losing an estimated £1.3 billion each year to returns fraud[1]. With many businesses offering lenient return policies to improve customer satisfaction, the likelihood of experiencing fraudulent returns has increased. For many retailers, returns fraud has become an unavoidable operational risk rather than an isolated issue.
Different types of returns fraud are contributing to these losses. Wardrobing remains one of the most common forms, with a significant proportion of consumers admitting to the practice. Other behaviours, such as returning items without intending to pay for them, further underline the scale of the challenge. Together, these trends highlight how widespread returns fraud has become and reinforce the need for businesses to take proactive steps to reduce fraud risk, while maintaining a positive customer experience.
The rise of online shopping and generous returns policies has made returns more convenient for customers, but it has also created opportunities for returns fraud. In some cases, these policies are exploited by individuals seeking to illegally profit at a retailer’s expense.
Today, refund fraud takes many forms. Fraudsters may use a range of tactics to secure refunds, store credit, or replacement items without returning products as intended. Understanding the most common types of fraudulent return schemes can help businesses identify vulnerabilities and take steps to reduce their exposure.

One common tactic involves returning an empty box. In these cases, an item is sent back with packaging materials to give the impression that the original product has been returned. Parcels are usually weighed at dispatch, keeping accurate shipment data, including weight can help businesses verify whether the returned package matches the original.
Another variation occurs when a customer claims a parcel arrived empty, alleging that the contents were missing on delivery or removed during transit. Tracking the parcel’s weight at each stage of its journey can be valuable when investigating these claims and determining whether further review is required.
To help prevent fraudulent returns, businesses should always inspect returned items before issuing a refund. Verifying that the contents match the original product can reduce exposure to this type of refund fraud and support a fair, consistent returns process.

Receipt fraud happens when receipts are misused to obtain refunds or store credit dishonestly. This type of refund fraud can take several forms and often exploits gaps in in-store or online returns processes.
To help prevent receipt fraud, retailers can review receipts carefully, use transaction validation systems, and apply consistent returns verification procedures before issuing refunds.
&
Switching fraud is where the item sent back is not the original product shipped. Instead, the returned item has been deliberately substituted to obtain a refund or store credit while keeping the original item.
Carefully inspecting returned items, verifying serial numbers or product identifiers, and reviewing pricing data can help retailers reduce switching fraud risk and limit losses linked to fraudulent returns.

Items are deliberately damaged or tampered after purchase and then claiming it arrived faulty. The goal is to obtain a refund or replacement while returning a product that is now unusable and no longer suitable for resale.
This tactic is commonly associated with electronic goods. In some cases, valuable internal components are removed from devices before the outer casing is returned, leaving retailers with a non‑functional product that appears externally intact.
Detecting this form of refund fraud can be challenging, but carefully assessing the condition of returned items, checking serial numbers, and testing electronics before issuing refunds can help businesses reduce the risk of bricking fraud and limit losses to fraudulent returns.

Wardrobing fraud occurs when an item is purchased with the intention of using it temporarily and then returning it within the permitted return window. This practice is commonly associated with clothing and footwear, particularly higher‑value or designer items that are worn once and then returned for a full refund.
While some individuals may view wardrobing as a harmless way to access premium products without long‑term commitment, it still constitutes a form of returns fraud. For retailers, worn items are often difficult or impossible to resell at full value, contributing to increased costs and operational challenges. Monitoring item condition on return and setting clear expectations within a returns policy can help businesses reduce the risk of wardrobing fraud.
Reducing returns fraud requires a layered approach. While no single measure will eliminate risk entirely, combining clear policies, operational controls, and staff awareness can significantly reduce exposure without compromising on customer experience.
1 CRO Commander - “UK Retailers Lose $2.6 Billion Annually to Policy Abuse”: https://crocommander.com/articles/e-commerce-cro/uk-retailers-lose-2-6-billion-annually-to-policy-abuse/
2 Fashion United – “Returns fraud is costing UK retailers 1.3 billion pounds a year”:https://fashionunited.uk/news/retail/returns-fraud-is-costing-uk-retailers-1-3-billion-pounds-a-year-heres-how-to-fight-back-in-2025/2025051581673